Tasmanian Government Logo

Integrity Commission Act Review

Report of the Independent Reviewer

Report of the Independent Reviewer

The Report by the Independent Reviewer, the Honourable William Cox AC, RFD, ED, QC into the Review of the Integrity Commission Act 2009 was tabled in Parliament on Wednesday 24 August 2016.

The Report can be downloaded from the links below.

About the Review

Independent Review of the Integrity Commission Act 2009

In accordance with section 106 of the Integrity Commission Act 2009 (the Act), the Minister for Justice had to commission an independent review of the Act (the Review) as soon as possible after 31 December 2015 to enable consideration of

  1. the operation of the Act in achieving its object and the objectives of the Integrity Commission
  2. the operation of the Integrity Commission, including the exercise of its powers, the investigation of complaints and the conduct of inquiries
  3. the operation of the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner
  4. the operation of the Joint Committee
  5. the effectiveness of orders and regulations made under this Act in furthering the object of this Act and the objectives of the Integrity Commission
  6. any other matters relevant to the effect of this Act in improving ethical conduct and public confidence in public authorities.

The Honourable William Cox AC, RFD, ED, QC has been appointed as the Independent Reviewer to undertake the Review.

The Review commenced on 1 February 2016 and is due to report by 31 May 2016. However, the Minister for Justice may extend this term by written notice to enable the Independent Reviewer to complete the Review.

The Independent Reviewer called for written submissions from interested parties to enable consideration of the matters detailed above. Written submissions are generally made public. Submitters could request that their submission be treated in confidence, in full or in part, and had to set out in writing the basis for the request to be treated in confidence.

The Independent Reviewer is responsible for determining the confidentiality of any written submissions.

Submissions

Information has been redacted from some submissions to maintain confidentiality and protect personal information. The Independent Reviewer has decided that some submissions received not be made public at this time.

Parties making submissions were also invited to indicate whether they wished to make oral submissions to the Independent Reviewer, either in private or public hearing and again the reasons for their requests.

The Independent Reviewer is responsible for deciding whether to take oral submissions in a private or public hearing.

At the conclusion of the Review the Independent Reviewer will provide the Minister with a written Report of his findings and recommendations.

The Minister must in accordance with section 106 transmit a copy of that Report to the President of the Legislative Council and the Speaker of the House of Assembly and cause a copy to be laid before each House of Parliament within 14 days of receiving it.

Queries in the first instance can be made by email to integrity.review@justice.tas.gov.au.

Frequently asked questions

What is the purpose of the Review?

What is the purpose of the Review?

Section 106 of the Integrity Commission Act 2009, requires that there be an independent Review of the Act and the entities created by the Act.

The matters to be considered as part of the review are specified in the Act. Those matters are:

  1. the operation of the Act in achieving its object and the objectives of the Integrity Commission
  2. the operation of the Integrity Commission, including the exercise of its powers, the investigation of complaints and the conduct of inquiries
  3. the operation of the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner
  4. the operation of the Joint Committee
  5. the effectiveness of orders and regulations made under this Act in furthering the object of this Act and the objectives of the Integrity Commission

any other matters relevant to the effect of this Act in improving ethical conduct and public confidence in public authorities.

Why do a review?

Why do a Review?

As with any new piece of legislation there are likely to be operational and other issues that arise as the provisions of the Act are used to deal with particular circumstances.

This review provides an opportunity for any of those issues to be raised and considered.

Who is the Independent Reviewer?

Who is the Independent Reviewer?

The Honourable William Cox AC, RFD, ED, QC was appointed from 1 February 2016 to undertake the Review.

Mr Cox is a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Tasmania.  He was also the Governor of Tasmania from 15 December 2004 until 1 April 2008.

How will the Review be conducted?

How will the Review be conducted?

The conduct of the Review is a matter for the Independent Reviewer.

The Independent Reviewer is required to invite submissions relevant to the Review from the public and prepare a written report for the Minister for Justice, the Hon Dr Vanessa Goodwin MLC.

How are written submissions handled?

How are written submissions handled?

Written submissions are generally made public unless there is a reason not to. The Independent Reviewer determines whether a submission is to be made public.

Some considerations in determining whether to make a submission public are:

  • A submission is not relevant or does not address the terms of reference.
  • The person or body making the submission has requested that their submission be treated in confidence, in full or in part.
  • A submission makes allegations or restates complaints about a person or body (not making the submission).
  • There are legal requirements for information in a submission for it to remain confidential.
  • The nature of any personal information in a submission.

How do I request my submission be kept confidential?

How do I request my submission be kept confidential?

You may request that your submission is kept confidential in your submission or a covering letter.

Are there any requirements for submissions?

Are there any requirements for submissions?

The Independent Reviewer must invite submissions relevant to the review from the public and give them due consideration.

The closing date for written submissions was 4 March 2016.

Submissions received after 4 March 2016 may be accepted at the discretion of the Independent Reviewer.

How can I make an oral submission?

How can I make an oral submission?

You may make a request to present an oral submission in your written submission or in a covering letter to the Independent Reviewer.

How are oral submissions/hearing conducted?

How are oral submissions/hearings conducted?

Hearings may be arranged to allow submitters to make an oral presentation.

The Independent Reviewer may ask a person or body to make an oral submission.

Attendance at a hearing to make an oral submission is voluntary.

The Independent Reviewer is responsible for deciding whether to take oral submissions in a private or public hearing.

When will the hearing be held?

When will the hearings be held?

The Independent Reviewer will decide when hearings will be held and who is to be invited to make oral submissions at the hearings.

The Independent Reviewer will contact those people whom he wishes to invite to make oral submissions.

What are the arrangements for the final report?

What are the arrangements for the final Report?

The Independent Reviewer must prepare a written report, and may seek the views of a person or body about part of his written report.   The Independent Reviewer is due to report to the Minister for Justice by 31 May 2016.

The Minister for Justice may extend this term by written notice to enable the Independent Reviewer to complete the Review.

The Minister is required to:

  • transmit a copy of the report to the President of the Legislative Council and the Speaker of the House of Assembly; and
  • arrange for a copy of the report to be tabled in each House of Parliament within 14 sitting-days of receiving it from the Independent Reviewer.

Will the report be made public?

Will the Report be made public?

Yes. Once the Report is tabled in Parliament it becomes a public document.

What assistance is the Reviewer receiving?

What assistance is the Reviewer receiving?

The Department of Justice is providing logistical and administrative support to the Independent Reviewer, but has no substantive role in the work of the Independent Reviewer.

This means that:

  • The Department is a receiving point for written submissions.
  • All written submissions received are provided to the Independent Reviewer, as received, in their entirety, with no moderation or commentary provided.

A part-time Executive Officer is available to assist the Independent Reviewer with administrative and secretariat support as required by the Independent Reviewer.  (In this role the Executive Officer takes direction from the Independent Reviewer not departmental officers, but may request assistance from other Department of Justice officers, for example to facilitate web publishing, word processing or payments to the Independent Reviewer).

Submissions